Tissue penetration of antimicrobials: Difference between revisions

From IDWiki
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
Line 251: Line 251:
 
| style="text-align:center" |
 
| style="text-align:center" |
 
| style="text-align:center" |
 
| style="text-align:center" |
  +
| style="text-align:center" |±[[CiteRef::jodlowski2020do]]
| style="text-align:center" |±<ref>Tomasz Jodlowski, Charles R Ashby, Sarath G Nath, Doxycycline for ESBL-E Cystitis, ''Clinical Infectious Diseases'', Volume 73, Issue 1, 1 July 2021, Pages e274–e275, https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa1898</ref>
 
 
| style="text-align:center" | +
 
| style="text-align:center" | +
 
| style="text-align:center" | +
 
| style="text-align:center" | +
Line 284: Line 284:
 
| style="text-align:center" |
 
| style="text-align:center" |
 
|-
 
|-
  +
! colspan="8" |Antifungals[[CiteRef::felton2014ti]]
! colspan="8" |Antifungals<ref>Felton T, Troke PF, Hope WW. Tissue penetration of antifungal agents. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014 Jan;27(1):68-88. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00046-13. PMID: 24396137; PMCID: [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3910906/ PMC3910906].</ref>
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
| rowspan="3" |[[Azoles]]
 
| rowspan="3" |[[Azoles]]

Latest revision as of 13:51, 19 September 2024

Summary

Class Antimicrobial Blood CNS Vitreous Urine Prostate Necrotic
Antibiotics: β-Lactams
Penicillins β-lactamase inhibitors
ampicillin + ±
piperacillin-tazobactam +†
Cephalosporins first-generation cephalosporins
second-generation cephalosporins
third-generation cephalosporins ± +†
ceftriaxone +
cefepime +
ceftazidime + ± +
Cephamycins cephamycins
cefoxitin
Carbapenems imipenem +
meropenem + + +
Antibiotics: Non-β-Lactams
Aminoglycosides
Chloramphenicol chloramphenicol +
Fluoroquinolones all –? + +
moxifloxacin
Fosfomycin fosfomycin +
Lincosamides clindamycin +
Lipopeptides daptomycin + +
Macrolides macrolides +
Nitrofurans nitrofurantoin +
Nitroimidazoles metronidazole +
Oxazolidinones linezolid + + + ±‡
Rifamycins rifampin +
Sulfonamides trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole +
Tetracyclines tetracyclines +
doxycycline ±1 + +
Antivirals
acyclovir / valacyclovir +
ganciclovir +
foscarnet
Antifungals2
Azoles fluconazole + + + ± +
itraconazole ± +
voriconazole ± ± ±
Echinocandins anidulafungin + ± ±
caspofungin + ±
micafungin ± ±
Polyenes deoxycholate amphotericin B +
liposomal amphotericin B ±† +
Class Antimicrobial Blood CNS Vitreous Urine Prostate Necrotic
  • † if inflammation present
  • ‡ very low levels, but likely enough for Enterococcus

Specific Tissues

Central Nervous System

  • Reviewed in 3
Class Antimicrobial CSF Penetration (AUC) With Meningeal Inflammation
Antibiotics
penicillins overall 2% 2%
ampicillin
amoxicillin 6%
cloxacillin 0.87%
piperacillin 3% 32%
beta lactamase inhibitors overall 7% 10%
clavulanate 4% 8%
tazobactam 11%
cephalosporins overall 0.7 to 10% 15%
cefotaxime 12% 4 to 17%
ceftriaxone 0.7%
ceftazidime 0.6%
carbapenems overall 20% 30%
imipenem 14%
meropenem 5 to 25% 39%
aminoglycosides overall 20%
fluoroquinolones overall 30 to 70% 70 to 90%
ciprofloxacin 24 to 43% 92%
levofloxacin 71%
moxifloxacin 46% 79%
chloramphenicol 60 to 70% 60 to 70%
macrolides clarithromycin 18%
tetracyclines doxycycline 20% 20%
fosfomycin 18%
linezolid 90%
metronidazole 87%
rifamycins rifampin 22%
trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole trimethoprim 18% 42 to 51%
sulfamethoxazole 12% 24 to 30%
glycopeptides vancomycin 14 to 18% 30%
antituberculosis medications isoniazid 86%
Antivirls
anti-herpes nucleoside analogues acyclovir 31%
valacyclovir 19%
foscarnet 27 to 43% 23 to 66%
HIV antiretrovirals abacavir 35%
zidovudine 75%
indinavir 6 to 15%
lopinavir 29%
Antifungals
flucytosine 74%
azoles fluconazole 86%
voriconazole 46%
polyenes amphotericin B low
Antiparasitics
albendazole 38 to 43%
praziquantel 24%
sulfadiazine 27 to 33%

Prostate

  • Poorly penetrated by most antibiotics
  • Penetration is higher with a high concentration gradient, high lipid solubility, low degree of ionization, high dissociation constant, low protein binding, and small molecular size
  • Fluoroquinolones are the mainstay of therapy, though there is increasing resistance
  • TMP-SMX often used, though conflicting data about its penetration into the prostate
  • Minocycline, doxycycline, and macrolides achieve high levels in the prostate but are rarely indicated for the causative organisms
  • Third-generation cephalosporins and carbapenems can be used
  • Piperacillin, aztreonam, imipenem, and some aminoglycosides are likely useful

Bone

  • Essentially all antibiotics achieve similar bone-to-serum levels, with the exception of oral β-lactams which nevertheless have no worse outcomes4

Eye

Class Antimicrobial Retinal Penetration Vitreal Penetration Ref
Antibiotics
penicillins ampicillin below MIC in non-inflamed rabbit eyes 5
amoxicillin 2% (below MIC) in non-inflamed rabbit eyes 5
piperacillin undetectable in inflamed human eyes 5
cephalosporins cefazolin above MIC in inflamed rabbit eyes 5
ceftriaxone 4% in non-inflamed human eyes 5
ceftazidime 30% in inflamed rabbit eyes 5
cefipime 8% in non-inflamed human eyes 5
carbapenems imipenem 8 to 10% in non-inflamed human eyes 5
meropenem 30% in non-inflamed human eyes 5
oxazolidinones linezolid 30 to 80% in non-inflamed human eyes 5
vancomycin above MIC in inflamed rabbit eyes 5
daptomycin 30% in inflamed human eyes 5
aminoglycosides amikacin below MIC in inflamed rabbit eyes 5
gentamicin below MIC in inflamed rabbit eyes 5
fluoroquinolones ciprofloxacin below MIC in non-inflamed human eyes 5
levofloxacin 30% but below MIC in non-inflamed human eyes 5
moxifloxacin 10 to 40% and above MIC in non-inflamed human eyes 5
Antifungals
azoles fluconazole 40 to 50% 40 to 50% 62
itraconazole 10% in inflamed eyes 2
posaconazole 20% in inflamed eyes 2
voriconazole 40 to 100% 2
flucytosine 40 to 100% 2
polyenes liposomal amphotericin B only detectable in inflamed eyes 2
echinocandins echinocandins very low penetration 2
micafungin excellent undetectable 62
Antivirals
acyclovir above IC
valacyclovir 20 to 30%, above IC in non-inflamed human eyes 7
ganciclovir close to IC
foscarnet 100% 10%, close to IC 8

References

  1. ^  Cornelia B. Landersdorfer, Jürgen B. Bulitta, Martina Kinzig, Ulrike Holzgrabe, Fritz Sörgel. Penetration of Antibacterials into Bone. Clinical Pharmacokinetics. 2009;48(2):89-124. doi:10.2165/00003088-200948020-00002.