Fluconazole: Difference between revisions
From IDWiki
(added breakpoints table) |
(added ECVs) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*Efficacy predicted by AUC/MIC ratio |
*Efficacy predicted by AUC/MIC ratio |
||
=== Breakpoints === |
|||
{| class="wikitable" |
{| class="wikitable" |
||
! rowspan="2" |Species |
! rowspan="2" |Species |
||
! rowspan="2" |ECV (μg/mL) |
|||
! colspan="4" |Breakpoints (μg/mL) |
! colspan="4" |Breakpoints (μg/mL) |
||
! colspan="4" |Breakpoints (mm) |
! colspan="4" |Breakpoints (mm) |
||
Line 25: | Line 27: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
|[[Candida albicans]] |
|[[Candida albicans]] |
||
|0.5 |
|||
|≤2 |
|≤2 |
||
|— |
|— |
||
Line 33: | Line 36: | ||
|14-16 |
|14-16 |
||
|≤13 |
|≤13 |
||
|- |
|||
|[[Candida dubliniensis]] |
|||
|0.5 |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
|[[Candida glabrata]] |
|[[Candida glabrata]] |
||
|8 |
|||
|— |
|— |
||
|— |
|— |
||
Line 43: | Line 58: | ||
|≥15 |
|≥15 |
||
|≤14 |
|≤14 |
||
|- |
|||
|[[Candida guilliermondii]] |
|||
|8 |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
|[[Candida krusei]] |
|[[Candida krusei]] |
||
| |
|||
| colspan="4" |intrinsically resistant |
| colspan="4" |intrinsically resistant |
||
| colspan="4" |intrinsically resistant |
| colspan="4" |intrinsically resistant |
||
|- |
|||
|[[Candida lusitaniae]] |
|||
|1 |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
| |
|||
|- |
|- |
||
|[[Candida parapsilosis]] |
|[[Candida parapsilosis]] |
||
|1 |
|||
|≤2 |
|≤2 |
||
|— |
|— |
||
Line 59: | Line 98: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
|[[Candida tropicalis]] |
|[[Candida tropicalis]] |
||
|1 |
|||
|≤2 |
|≤2 |
||
|— |
|— |
||
Line 67: | Line 107: | ||
|14-16 |
|14-16 |
||
|≤13 |
|≤13 |
||
|- |
|||
|[[Cryptococcus neoformans]] |
|||
|8 |
|||
| colspan="8" rowspan="2" | |
|||
|- |
|||
|[[Cryptococcus gattii]] |
|||
|16-32 |
|||
|} |
|} |
||
Revision as of 20:38, 21 August 2020
Background
- Antifungal in the triazole family with excellent bioavadilability but limited efficacy outside of Candida
Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
- Good oral bioavailability
- Good CNS penetration
- Fungistatic
- Efficacy predicted by AUC/MIC ratio
Breakpoints
Species | ECV (μg/mL) | Breakpoints (μg/mL) | Breakpoints (mm) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S | I | SDD | R | S | I | SDD | R | ||
Candida albicans | 0.5 | ≤2 | — | 4 | ≥8 | ≥17 | — | 14-16 | ≤13 |
Candida dubliniensis | 0.5 | ||||||||
Candida glabrata | 8 | — | — | ≤32 | ≥64 | — | — | ≥15 | ≤14 |
Candida guilliermondii | 8 | ||||||||
Candida krusei | intrinsically resistant | intrinsically resistant | |||||||
Candida lusitaniae | 1 | ||||||||
Candida parapsilosis | 1 | ≤2 | — | 4 | ≥8 | ≥17 | — | 14-16 | ≤13 |
Candida tropicalis | 1 | ≤2 | — | 4 | ≥8 | ≥17 | — | 14-16 | ≤13 |
Cryptococcus neoformans | 8 | ||||||||
Cryptococcus gattii | 16-32 |
Monitoring
- ECG for QT prolongation
- Liver enzymes for hepatitis
Adverse Drug Reactions
- Best side effect profiles of the antifungals
- Before starting, check:
- Liver enzymes as baseline (hepatitis)
- Creatinine (requires renal dosing)
- EKG (QTc prolongation)
- Beware drug-drug interactions, especially with new DOACs