Tissue penetration of antimicrobials: Difference between revisions
From IDWiki
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
|NO |
|NO |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| − | | rowspan=" |
+ | | rowspan="4" |Cephalosporins |
| − | |first |
+ | |first-generation cephalosporins |
| |
| |
||
|NO |
|NO |
||
| |
| |
||
|NO |
|NO |
||
| + | |- |
||
| + | |second-generation cephalosporins |
||
| + | | |
||
| + | |NO |
||
| + | | |
||
| + | | |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|[[cefepime]] |
|[[cefepime]] |
||
Revision as of 09:48, 24 August 2020
| Class | Antimicrobial | Blood | CNS | Urine | Necrotic |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antibiotics | |||||
| Penicillins | β-lactamase inhibitors | NO | |||
| ampicillin | YES | NO | |||
| Cephalosporins | first-generation cephalosporins | NO | NO | ||
| second-generation cephalosporins | NO | ||||
| cefepime | YES | ||||
| ceftazidime | YES | YES | |||
| Cephamycins | cephamycins | NO | |||
| cefoxitin | NO | ||||
| Carbapenems | imipenem | YES | |||
| Aminoglycosides | NO | ||||
| Fluoroquinolones | NO? | YES | |||
| Lincosamides | clindamycin | NO | YES | ||
| Macrolides | NO | ||||
| Nitroimidazoles | metronidazole | YES | |||
| Tetracyclines | tetracyclines | NO | |||
| doxycycline | YES | ||||
| Chloramphenicol | chloramphenicol | YES | |||
| Antifungals | |||||
| Azoles | fluconazole | YES | |||
References
- ^ Cornelia B. Landersdorfer, Jürgen B. Bulitta, Martina Kinzig, Ulrike Holzgrabe, Fritz Sörgel. Penetration of Antibacterials into Bone. Clinical Pharmacokinetics. 2009;48(2):89-124. doi:10.2165/00003088-200948020-00002.
