Imaging in osteomyelitis: Difference between revisions
From IDWiki
(Imported from text file) |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= Imaging in osteomyelitis = |
|||
{| |
{| |
||
! Technique |
! Technique |
||
Line 186: | Line 184: | ||
* Pineda C, Espinosa R, Pena A. [[10.1055/s-0029-1214160|Radiographic Imaging in Osteomyelitis: The Role of Plain Radiography, Computed Tomography, Ultrasonography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Scintigraphy]]. ''Semin Plast Surg''. 2009;23(2):080-089. |
* Pineda C, Espinosa R, Pena A. [[10.1055/s-0029-1214160|Radiographic Imaging in Osteomyelitis: The Role of Plain Radiography, Computed Tomography, Ultrasonography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Scintigraphy]]. ''Semin Plast Surg''. 2009;23(2):080-089. |
||
[[Category:Bone and joint infections]] |
Revision as of 17:33, 13 August 2019
Technique | Advantages | Disadvantages | Sn/Sp | Main Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|
X-ray | Inexpensive | Late diagnosis | 43 to 75%/75 to 83% | Lytic lesions, osteopenia, periosteal thickening, loss of trabecular architecture, new bone apposition |
Reproducible | Confusing | |||
Accessible | Radiation | |||
CT | Excellent spatial resolution | Cost | 67%/50% (chronic) | Blurring of fat planes |
Availability | Increased density of fatty marrow | |||
Radiation exposure | Periosteal reaction | |||
Cortical erosion or destruction | ||||
Sequestra, involucra, intraosseous gas | ||||
US | Accessibility, inexpensive, real-time evaluation | Operator dependent | To be determined | Elevated periosteum |
Guided aspiration-biopsy | US beam cannot cross cortical bone | Soft tissue abscess | ||
Fluid collection | ||||
MRI | Excellent spatial resolution | Cost | 82 to 100%/75 to 96% | Acute |
Early detection | Availability | T1-weighted: low-signal-intensity medullary space | ||
Assessment of the extent of tissue affected | Time requested | T2-weighted: high signal intensity surrounding inflammatory processes, edema | ||
Gadolinium: enhances areas of necrosis | ||||
Subacute | ||||
Evidence of Brodie's abscess, single or multiple radiolucent abscesses | ||||
T1-weighted: central abscess cavity with low signal intensity | ||||
T2-weighted: high signal intensity of granulation tissue surrounded by low-signal-intensity band of bone sclerosis (double-line effect) | ||||
Chronic | ||||
T1- and T2-weighted: low-signal-intensity areas of devascularized fibrotic scarring in the marrow | ||||
Bone scan | Sensitive | Nonspecific | ~85%/~25% | Focal hyperperfusion |
Availability | Further imaging evaluation required | Focal hyperemia | ||
Relatively inexpensive | Focal bone uptake | |||
Early detection | ||||
Bone+WBC scan | Reliable when clearly positive or negative | Need for two isotopes with multiple imaging sessions over several days | ~60%/~80% | Localized area of increased uptake |
High radiation exposure | ||||
Large number of equivocal results | ||||
Long examination time |
Further Reading
- Pineda C, Espinosa R, Pena A. Radiographic Imaging in Osteomyelitis: The Role of Plain Radiography, Computed Tomography, Ultrasonography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Scintigraphy. Semin Plast Surg. 2009;23(2):080-089.