Imaging in osteomyelitis: Difference between revisions

From IDWiki
(Imported from text file)
 
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
= Imaging in osteomyelitis =

{|
{|
! Technique
! Technique
Line 186: Line 184:


* Pineda C, Espinosa R, Pena A. [[10.1055/s-0029-1214160|Radiographic Imaging in Osteomyelitis: The Role of Plain Radiography, Computed Tomography, Ultrasonography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Scintigraphy]]. ''Semin Plast Surg''. 2009;23(2):080-089.
* Pineda C, Espinosa R, Pena A. [[10.1055/s-0029-1214160|Radiographic Imaging in Osteomyelitis: The Role of Plain Radiography, Computed Tomography, Ultrasonography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Scintigraphy]]. ''Semin Plast Surg''. 2009;23(2):080-089.


[[Category:Bone and joint infections]]

Revision as of 17:33, 13 August 2019

Technique Advantages Disadvantages Sn/Sp Main Findings
X-ray Inexpensive Late diagnosis 43 to 75%/75 to 83% Lytic lesions, osteopenia, periosteal thickening, loss of trabecular architecture, new bone apposition
Reproducible Confusing
Accessible Radiation
CT Excellent spatial resolution Cost 67%/50% (chronic) Blurring of fat planes
Availability Increased density of fatty marrow
Radiation exposure Periosteal reaction
Cortical erosion or destruction
Sequestra, involucra, intraosseous gas
US Accessibility, inexpensive, real-time evaluation Operator dependent To be determined Elevated periosteum
Guided aspiration-biopsy US beam cannot cross cortical bone Soft tissue abscess
Fluid collection
MRI Excellent spatial resolution Cost 82 to 100%/75 to 96% Acute
Early detection Availability T1-weighted: low-signal-intensity medullary space
Assessment of the extent of tissue affected Time requested T2-weighted: high signal intensity surrounding inflammatory processes, edema
Gadolinium: enhances areas of necrosis
Subacute
Evidence of Brodie's abscess, single or multiple radiolucent abscesses
T1-weighted: central abscess cavity with low signal intensity
T2-weighted: high signal intensity of granulation tissue surrounded by low-signal-intensity band of bone sclerosis (double-line effect)
Chronic
T1- and T2-weighted: low-signal-intensity areas of devascularized fibrotic scarring in the marrow
Bone scan Sensitive Nonspecific ~85%/~25% Focal hyperperfusion
Availability Further imaging evaluation required Focal hyperemia
Relatively inexpensive Focal bone uptake
Early detection
Bone+WBC scan Reliable when clearly positive or negative Need for two isotopes with multiple imaging sessions over several days ~60%/~80% Localized area of increased uptake
High radiation exposure
Large number of equivocal results
Long examination time

Further Reading