Antimicrobial stewardship program: Difference between revisions
From IDWiki
(added Further Reading) |
m (→: typo) |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== Core Elements == |
== Core Elements == |
||
=== Hospital Leadership Commitment === |
|||
* Senior hospital management leadership towards antimicrobial stewardship |
|||
* Need support from senior leadership, including chief medical officer, chief nursing officer, and director of pharmacy |
|||
* Accountability and responsibilities |
|||
* Available expertise on infection management |
|||
* Need leaders to give time to manage the program, resource (including staffing) |
|||
* Education and practical training |
|||
* Leaders should champion the program |
|||
* Other actions aiming at responsible antimicrobial use |
|||
* Regular reporting to senior leadership |
|||
* Monitoring and surveillance |
|||
* Reporting and feedback |
|||
=== Accountability === |
|||
* The leaders must be accountable for management and outcomes |
|||
* Co-leaders should have clear delineation of responsibilities and expectations |
|||
=== Pharmacy Expertise === |
|||
* Available expertise on infection management from ID-trained pharmacists or, if none exists, general clinical pharmacists |
|||
=== Action === |
|||
* Choose interventions that will best improve outcomes |
|||
==== Priority Interventions ==== |
|||
* Prospective audit and feedback, which can be made more effective with face-to-face meetings with prescribers ("handshake stewardship") |
|||
* Preauthorization |
|||
==== Infection-Based Interventions ==== |
|||
* Facility-specific treatment guidelines, particularly for CAP, UTI, and SSTI, as well as [[sepsis]], [[Staphylococcus aureus]] infection, [[Clostridioides difficile]] infection |
|||
* Review of the management of cases of [[sepsis]], [[Staphylococcus aureus]] infection, [[Clostridioides difficile]] infection |
|||
* Review of culture-proven invasive infections |
|||
* Review of planned OPAT |
|||
==== Provider-Based Interventions ==== |
|||
* Antibiotic timeouts, with scheduled reassessment at 48-72 hours by the prescriber |
|||
** Not a substitution for prospective audit and feedback |
|||
** May not decrease antimicrobial use, but may improve appropriateness |
|||
* Assessing penicillin allergy |
|||
** History, challenge doses, and skin testing |
|||
** May involve nurses for the assessments |
|||
==== Pharmacy-Based Interventions ==== |
|||
* Documentation of indication for antibiotics can improve antibiotic use |
|||
* Automatic substitutions from IV to oral therapy |
|||
* Interventions to reduce the duration of antibiotics to shortest effective duration |
|||
* Dose adjustments and optimization |
|||
** PK monitoring and adjustment of [[aminoglycosides]] and [[vancomycin]] |
|||
** Alternative dosing of β-lactams |
|||
* Duplicative therapy alerts |
|||
* Time-sensitive automatic stop orders |
|||
* Detection and prevention of [[drug-drug interactions]] |
|||
* Reducing use of antibiotics with increased risk of [[Clostridioides difficile]] infection |
|||
==== Microbiology- and Laboratory-Based Interventions ==== |
|||
* Selective reporting of susceptibility testing |
|||
* Comments in microbiology reports |
|||
* Development of stratified antibiograms (e.g. by location or age) |
|||
* Rapid viral testing for respiratory pathogens to reduce the use of inappropriate antibiotics |
|||
* Rapid diagnostic testing on blood specimens |
|||
* Serial procalcitonin in ICU patients |
|||
==== Nursing-Based Interventions ==== |
|||
* Optimizing microbiology culture collection (see also [[Diagnostic stewardship of urine cultures]]) |
|||
* IV to oral transitions |
|||
* Prompting antibiotic timeouts |
|||
=== Tracking === |
|||
==== Antimicrobial Use ==== |
|||
* Days of therapy (DOTs) or defined daily doses (DDDs) |
|||
* Standardized antimicrobial administration ratio (SAAR), which compares actual use to expected use based on a statistical model |
|||
==== Outcome Measures ==== |
|||
* [[Clostridioides difficile]] infection rates |
|||
* [[Antimicrobial resistance]] |
|||
* Financial impact, though costs often stabilize after initial improvement |
|||
==== Process Measures for QI ==== |
|||
* For prospective audit and feedback, tracking the types of recommendations and whether they are accepted |
|||
* For preauthorization, tracking agents that are generating requests and ensuring that preauthorization is not delaying appropriate therapy |
|||
* For facility-specific treatment guidelines, monitoring adherence |
|||
* Others can include: |
|||
** Monitoring how often antibiotic timeouts are done and if changes are made |
|||
** Evaluating medication use for select antibiotics, typically using standardized audit forms |
|||
** Monitoring conversions from IV to oral antimicrobials |
|||
** Monitoring the frequency of duplicative therapy (e.g. double anaerobic coverage) |
|||
** Assessing the appropriateness of discharge antibiotics and durations |
|||
=== Reporting === |
|||
* Regular updates to prescribers, pharmacists, nurses, and leadership on both outcome and process measures |
|||
* Provider-specific reports with comparisons to peers can be helpful |
|||
=== Education === |
|||
* Education and practical training is helpful but not enough |
|||
* May include didactic presentations, posters, flyers, and newsletters, and mailing list emails |
|||
== Ineffective Interventions == |
|||
* Cycling antibiotics |
|||
== Further Reading == |
== Further Reading == |
||
Line 18: | Line 106: | ||
* Implementing an Antibiotic Stewardship Program: Guidelines by the IDSA and the SHEA. ''Clin Infect Dis''. 2016;62(10):e51-e77. doi: [https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciw118 10.1093/cid/ciw118] |
* Implementing an Antibiotic Stewardship Program: Guidelines by the IDSA and the SHEA. ''Clin Infect Dis''. 2016;62(10):e51-e77. doi: [https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciw118 10.1093/cid/ciw118] |
||
* IDSA and the SHEA Guidelines for Developing an Institutional Program to Enhance Antimicrobial Stewardship. ''Clin Infect Dis''. 2007;44:159-77. doi: [https://doi.org/10.1086/510393 10.1086/510393] |
* IDSA and the SHEA Guidelines for Developing an Institutional Program to Enhance Antimicrobial Stewardship. ''Clin Infect Dis''. 2007;44:159-77. doi: [https://doi.org/10.1086/510393 10.1086/510393] |
||
* ''The Core Elements of Hospital Antibiotic Stewardship Programs: 2019''. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2019. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/antibiotic-use/core-elements/hospital.html. |
Latest revision as of 10:51, 21 September 2022
Background
- Program to ensure that antimicrobials are used appropriately, in order to improve patient outcomes
Core Elements
Hospital Leadership Commitment
- Need support from senior leadership, including chief medical officer, chief nursing officer, and director of pharmacy
- Need leaders to give time to manage the program, resource (including staffing)
- Leaders should champion the program
- Regular reporting to senior leadership
Accountability
- The leaders must be accountable for management and outcomes
- Co-leaders should have clear delineation of responsibilities and expectations
Pharmacy Expertise
- Available expertise on infection management from ID-trained pharmacists or, if none exists, general clinical pharmacists
Action
- Choose interventions that will best improve outcomes
Priority Interventions
- Prospective audit and feedback, which can be made more effective with face-to-face meetings with prescribers ("handshake stewardship")
- Preauthorization
Infection-Based Interventions
- Facility-specific treatment guidelines, particularly for CAP, UTI, and SSTI, as well as sepsis, Staphylococcus aureus infection, Clostridioides difficile infection
- Review of the management of cases of sepsis, Staphylococcus aureus infection, Clostridioides difficile infection
- Review of culture-proven invasive infections
- Review of planned OPAT
Provider-Based Interventions
- Antibiotic timeouts, with scheduled reassessment at 48-72 hours by the prescriber
- Not a substitution for prospective audit and feedback
- May not decrease antimicrobial use, but may improve appropriateness
- Assessing penicillin allergy
- History, challenge doses, and skin testing
- May involve nurses for the assessments
Pharmacy-Based Interventions
- Documentation of indication for antibiotics can improve antibiotic use
- Automatic substitutions from IV to oral therapy
- Interventions to reduce the duration of antibiotics to shortest effective duration
- Dose adjustments and optimization
- PK monitoring and adjustment of aminoglycosides and vancomycin
- Alternative dosing of β-lactams
- Duplicative therapy alerts
- Time-sensitive automatic stop orders
- Detection and prevention of drug-drug interactions
- Reducing use of antibiotics with increased risk of Clostridioides difficile infection
Microbiology- and Laboratory-Based Interventions
- Selective reporting of susceptibility testing
- Comments in microbiology reports
- Development of stratified antibiograms (e.g. by location or age)
- Rapid viral testing for respiratory pathogens to reduce the use of inappropriate antibiotics
- Rapid diagnostic testing on blood specimens
- Serial procalcitonin in ICU patients
Nursing-Based Interventions
- Optimizing microbiology culture collection (see also Diagnostic stewardship of urine cultures)
- IV to oral transitions
- Prompting antibiotic timeouts
Tracking
Antimicrobial Use
- Days of therapy (DOTs) or defined daily doses (DDDs)
- Standardized antimicrobial administration ratio (SAAR), which compares actual use to expected use based on a statistical model
Outcome Measures
- Clostridioides difficile infection rates
- Antimicrobial resistance
- Financial impact, though costs often stabilize after initial improvement
Process Measures for QI
- For prospective audit and feedback, tracking the types of recommendations and whether they are accepted
- For preauthorization, tracking agents that are generating requests and ensuring that preauthorization is not delaying appropriate therapy
- For facility-specific treatment guidelines, monitoring adherence
- Others can include:
- Monitoring how often antibiotic timeouts are done and if changes are made
- Evaluating medication use for select antibiotics, typically using standardized audit forms
- Monitoring conversions from IV to oral antimicrobials
- Monitoring the frequency of duplicative therapy (e.g. double anaerobic coverage)
- Assessing the appropriateness of discharge antibiotics and durations
Reporting
- Regular updates to prescribers, pharmacists, nurses, and leadership on both outcome and process measures
- Provider-specific reports with comparisons to peers can be helpful
Education
- Education and practical training is helpful but not enough
- May include didactic presentations, posters, flyers, and newsletters, and mailing list emails
Ineffective Interventions
- Cycling antibiotics
Further Reading
- How to start an antimicrobial stewardship programme in a hospital. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019;26(4):447-453. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.08.007
- Implementing an Antibiotic Stewardship Program: Guidelines by the IDSA and the SHEA. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62(10):e51-e77. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw118
- IDSA and the SHEA Guidelines for Developing an Institutional Program to Enhance Antimicrobial Stewardship. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44:159-77. doi: 10.1086/510393
- The Core Elements of Hospital Antibiotic Stewardship Programs: 2019. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2019. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/antibiotic-use/core-elements/hospital.html.