Clinical frailty scale: Difference between revisions
From IDWiki
(Imported from text file) |
m (Aidan moved page Clinical Frailty to Clinical frailty scale without leaving a redirect) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
 |
|||
# '''Very fit:''' robust, active, energetic, well motivated and fit; these people commonly exercise regularly and are in the most fit group for their age |
# '''Very fit:''' robust, active, energetic, well motivated and fit; these people commonly exercise regularly and are in the most fit group for their age |
||
# '''Well:''' without active disease, but less fit than people in category 1 |
# '''Well:''' without active disease, but less fit than people in category 1 |
||
Latest revision as of 20:44, 5 July 2020
- Very fit: robust, active, energetic, well motivated and fit; these people commonly exercise regularly and are in the most fit group for their age
- Well: without active disease, but less fit than people in category 1
- Well, with treated comorbid disease: disease symptoms are well controlled compared with those in category 4
- Apparently vulnerable: although not frankly dependent, these people commonly complain of being "slowed up" or have disease symptoms
- Mildly frail: with limited dependence on others forinstrumental activities of daily living
- Moderately frail: help is needed with both instrumental and non-instrumental activities of daily living
- Severely frail: completely dependent on others for the activities of daily living, or terminally ill
Further Reading
- Rockwood K, et al. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ. 2005;173(5):489-495.
