Enterococcus bacteremia: Difference between revisions
From IDWiki
Enterococcus bacteremia
No edit summary |
(→) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== DENOVA Score == |
== DENOVA Score == |
||
| − | * Berge A, Krantz A, Östlund H, Nauclér P, Rasmussen M. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-018-1208-3 The DENOVA score efficiently identifies patients with monomicrobial Enterococcus faecalis bacteremia where echocardiography is not necessary |
+ | * Berge A, Krantz A, Östlund H, Nauclér P, Rasmussen M. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-018-1208-3 The DENOVA score efficiently identifies patients with monomicrobial Enterococcus faecalis bacteremia where echocardiography is not necessary]. ''Infection''. 2019 Feb;47(1):45-50. |
* Determines need for echocardiography |
* Determines need for echocardiography |
||
* Components: |
* Components: |
||
Revision as of 21:15, 15 August 2019
DENOVA Score
- Berge A, Krantz A, Östlund H, Nauclér P, Rasmussen M. The DENOVA score efficiently identifies patients with monomicrobial Enterococcus faecalis bacteremia where echocardiography is not necessary. Infection. 2019 Feb;47(1):45-50.
- Determines need for echocardiography
- Components:
- Duration of symptoms (≥7 days)
- Embolization (clinical or radiographic)
- Number of positive cultures ≥2
- Origin of infection unknown
- Valve disease: native valve disease, previous IE, or the presence of a valve prosthesis
- Auscultation of murmur (any)
- A cutoff of ≥3 had sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 85% for endocarditis
